feat: improve readability of list fields in CIM review
- Add normalizeToMarkdown() that converts inline "1) ... 2) ..." patterns to properly spaced markdown numbered lists for existing documents - Update Zod schema descriptions to instruct LLM to use newline-separated numbered items in list fields (keyAttractions, potentialRisks, etc.) - Fixes wall-of-text rendering in investment thesis and next steps sections Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -93,18 +93,18 @@ export const cimReviewSchema = z.object({
|
||||
}).describe("Management Team Overview section"),
|
||||
|
||||
preliminaryInvestmentThesis: z.object({
|
||||
keyAttractions: z.string().describe("Key Attractions / Strengths (Why Invest?)"),
|
||||
potentialRisks: z.string().describe("Potential Risks / Concerns (Why Not Invest?)"),
|
||||
valueCreationLevers: z.string().describe("Initial Value Creation Levers (How PE Adds Value)"),
|
||||
keyAttractions: z.string().describe("Key Attractions / Strengths (Why Invest?) — list each point on its own line, e.g. '1. Point one\\n2. Point two'"),
|
||||
potentialRisks: z.string().describe("Potential Risks / Concerns (Why Not Invest?) — list each point on its own line, e.g. '1. Point one\\n2. Point two'"),
|
||||
valueCreationLevers: z.string().describe("Initial Value Creation Levers (How PE Adds Value) — list each lever on its own line, e.g. '1. Lever one\\n2. Lever two'"),
|
||||
alignmentWithFundStrategy: z.string().describe("Alignment with Fund Strategy"),
|
||||
}).describe("Preliminary Investment Thesis section"),
|
||||
|
||||
keyQuestionsNextSteps: z.object({
|
||||
criticalQuestions: z.string().describe("Critical Questions Arising from CIM Review"),
|
||||
missingInformation: z.string().describe("Key Missing Information / Areas for Diligence Focus"),
|
||||
preliminaryRecommendation: z.string().describe("Preliminary Recommendation"),
|
||||
criticalQuestions: z.string().describe("Critical Questions Arising from CIM Review — list each question on its own line, e.g. '1. Question one\\n2. Question two'"),
|
||||
missingInformation: z.string().describe("Key Missing Information / Areas for Diligence Focus — list each item on its own line"),
|
||||
preliminaryRecommendation: z.string().describe("Preliminary Recommendation (Pass / Proceed with Caution / Proceed with Detailed Diligence)"),
|
||||
rationaleForRecommendation: z.string().describe("Rationale for Recommendation (Brief)"),
|
||||
proposedNextSteps: z.string().describe("Proposed Next Steps"),
|
||||
proposedNextSteps: z.string().describe("Proposed Next Steps — list each step on its own line, e.g. '1. Step one\\n2. Step two'"),
|
||||
}).describe("Key Questions & Next Steps section"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user